Followers of Jersey
politics are in for a feast of fun over the next few weeks, as the
Town by-elections get under way. Psephology is a game of guesswork
most of the time, anyway, so I may as well join in.
If you only read this
blog to keep an eye on the opposition, you know who your people are.
Gordon Forrest in No. 1 and Ian Philpott in No. 2 are the
“establishment” candidates. Blatant marionettes, but if you are
among the thousands who actually like their puppeteers, then they are
your men.
But what if you want an
alternative? Frankly, you are spoilt for choice. If the name of your
game is Beat The Establishment, this will of course be a
disappointment, as the three or four of Us will split the vote in a
way the one each of Them will not, leaving Them the front-runners. On
the other hand, if you are interested in democracy and alternatives,
then you may be heartened by the vibrant interest in taking things
forward differently.
Should they consider
themselves socialists, No. 2 voters need look no further than Sam
Mezec. While his youth is no great advantage in politics, he is
intelligent, articulate, educated and sensible. Although he can be
rather gauche on the internet, this election will be determined
offline, and being both a good conversationalist and public speaker
will pick him up many more votes than his occasional online gaffes
could cost him.
No.1's socialists have
a tougher choice though. If the cliches of life coaching, about
Wanting It and Working For It, held any truth, Nick le Cornu would
not be a candidate, he would already be a sitting member. Sadly, for
him, being desperately earnest and enthusiastic is never quite
enough. He is a convinced Marxist trying to fight the Class War for
the more deserving side. However most of those he would fight for
are not Marxists, and do not see themselves as proletarian class
warriors, and not all the rest feel a posh lawyer makes a convincing
champion.
Also in No. 1's Red
Corner, though, is dark horse Maureen Morgan. While she also
professes left-wing ideals, she is a radically different personality
to Nick, and can hope to collect the votes of both those who like
Nick's views but not his manner, and those who like Paul le Claire's
attitude without having confidence in his intellect. For her, it
will all hinge on the doorstep chats, I think, but I have no idea how
well she does them.
There are a lot of
voters in Jersey, who like neither the establishment nor socialism,
of course. The famous centre ground. They are probably the biggest
block of votes, but they are getting more ways to split theirs. In
particular, No. 2 have little to separate community stalwarts Paul
Huelin and Bernie Manning. I think Huelin will take votes from
Philpott, while Bernie is a little more radical. The question is,
will his softer persona and political stance than Sam take more votes
than Sam's panache and boldness take back?
No.1's middle ground
will be fought for by veteran ex-politician Paul le Claire and Roy
Travert. The charisma is very unfairly shared between them, le Claire
being as dull and monotonous as Travert is vital and animated.
However, Travert has seemed rather shallow in previous campaigns,
whereas le Claire is an assiduously deep, even if not particularly
lucid, thinker who speaks with reams of notes before him. Despite
Travert's force of personality, I think people will trust le Claire
more. Then again, Morgan is downplaying her left-wing sympathies, and
might capture the someone-to-trust vote better still.
If the readers who
comment are a fair sample, your votes will be going to the unofficial
Reform Party, Mezec and le Cornu. But who will the many non-readers
actually vote in?
My guesses, for you to
laugh at the following day, are Sam Mezec by a landslide in No. 2, by
simply being obviously the highest calibre candidate, while No. 1
will be very close, possibly recounted, with Forrest coming bottom,
then Morgan, Travert and le Cornu closely bunched and le Claire
scraping in. I think it is a wide open race, though, and the only
winner that would actually surprise me would be Forrest.
So, right about Sam's landslide, and wrong about everything else. Must Do Better!
ReplyDeleteWell you got that one wrong! Travet and Le Claire are now clearly both political history. I think what did the former was that people saw how he would stand anywhere to try and get elected - no one likes an opportunist mercenary. As for Le Claire, he just finally got overtaken by his reputation for being lazy though you are spot on about his rambling even with copious notes. But the good thing for me was that Morgan came a humiliating bottom of the pile. Twitter and Facebook revealed this woman to be a truly nasty piece of work with personal attacks on leftists, even ones who were not standing in the election. Add in a laziness that even made Le Claire look hardworking and you have to say Morgan rekindles the argument for a financial threshold to prevent time wasters and eccentric no hopers cluttering up the hustings. Forrest will be back because he needs the money judging by his petty debts court appearance (kept out of the media I note). Le Cornu having worked so hard to get in after 20 something years looks like going straight back out again because we barely hear a peep out of him in the States. Whatever happened to all the rhetoric, swagger and lectures about the Russian revolution? Agree on Sam Mezec though. He will walk back in come October.
ReplyDeleteNo wonder you get so few comments on here if when somebody finds you and posts one you block it! Not one of the tarot con woman's acolytes are you? RIP Simon
ReplyDeleteI didn't block your comment. It was just awaiting moderation, but I don't check daily when there is no fresh content to comment on, so I only found it today.
ReplyDelete